The following are the last three pages of the court report prepared by psychiatrists David Cassar, Peter Muscat, and Ethel Felice in 2014

English translation:

Experts' considerations

Nicholas Grech has been suffering from mental health problems since childhood. These symptoms have worsened over the years, leading him to attempt suicide as well as commit crimes, for which he was brought to court 13 years ago. He was detained at Mount Carmel Hospital for several years before being released on leave after an evaluation by the Tribunal for the Revision of Mental Health. Since 2002, he has been undergoing treatment.

It is relevant to note that the new crimes for which Nicholas Grech was rearrested and arraigned in court this year began when he stopped taking the psychiatric medication prescribed by his consultant psychiatrist without permission. Despite this, during each visit to Saint Luke's and Mater Dei Hospitals, he continued to insist that he was following his treatment.

Nicholas Grech's obsessional, magical, bizarre, and rigid thinking, along with his unusual behavior, reflect a mental illness that falls under the diagnosis of Schizotypal Disorder. This condition includes characteristics outlined in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10), described as follows: (etc., the rest written in English).

Analysis

Let us analyze what "the supposed experts" have written, bit by bit.

The first paragraph begins by stating that I have had mental health problems since childhood (note that the word used is zghir, meaning "child", not zaghzugh, which means "young"). However, they contradict this blatant lie within the same paragraph by stating that I have "been under treatment since 2002."

I was born in 1976, which means that in 2002, I was 26 years old. If I was a child at the end of the 1970s, then by 2002, I was certainly no longer a child. By that time, I had already completed tertiary education, graduated four years earlier, and had been working in a full-time job of responsibility.

If I had really suffered from mental health problems since childhood, this would have been documented in my school records. There would have been a psychiatrist treating me since I was a child, and I would have had a yellow card entitling me to free medication for mental illness. Yet, there is no such record—nothing at all—before 2002.

The year 2002 does not just expose this blatant lie about my supposed childhood mental illness; it also reveals another contradiction. Magistrate Carol Peralta appointed Psychiatrist David Cassar on my first court appearance on June 15, 2001, during my first case. Yet, months passed before Cassar saw me for the first time, on February 18, 2002, just two weeks after Peralta himself threatened to smash me against the wall during my fourth court sitting on February 4, 2002.

As if that were not enough, the same first paragraph contains another blatant lie: that I had “been detained at Mount Carmel Hospital for several years” prior to my second arrest in 2014. In reality, I was forcibly confined to the hospital for only 37 days in 2002 (from June 12 to July 19)—a move clearly intended to intimidate and discredit me (in their attempt to save Magistrate Peralta's career after his fiasco just 4 months before). Then, in 2005, after the appeal of my first case, I was detained for exactly two months (21-Nov-05 till 21-Jan-06from 21-Nov-05, to 21-Jan-06). This totals just three months and one week — far from the claim of "several years." Furthermore, I only took sick leave for those 37 days in 2002 (despite not actually being sick), while for the two months in 2005–2006, I took unpaid leave to avoid risking my job. In total, I worked 15 and a half years before my second arrest in 2014.

The claim of "several suicide attempts" is equally absurd. If that were true, I must have more than one life, as I have never died, never been left disabled, and never even been hospitalized as a result of such attempts. This would be nothing short of a miracle — unless, of course, I had the Virgin Mary herself watching over me, while the undertaker cursed his luck! Once again, this proves the utter incompetence of these so-called psychiatrists and court experts, who failed to see the obvious: I was deceiving them, making a fool of them as if I were telling a story to a little child.

But what is truly astonishing is that, despite labeling me suicidal, Psychiatrist David Cassar prescribed me Fluanxol / Depixol — an injection that actually makes you suicidal! (See the linked table with dates showing when these venomous injections were administered.)

The second paragraph is even more interesting. If they are claiming that I repeatedly deceived my "Consultant Psychiatrist," Dr. Cassar, at every outpatient visit by making him falsely believe that I was taking my treatment, then they are implying that he was completely naive—or even incompetent—for believing me so many times.

After all, if I had lied to him repeatedly about taking my medication, why would he unquestioningly believe me when I later claimed to have "stopped the psychiatric medication"? Shouldn't he have at least suspected that I might be lying again? In reality, I had never taken any medication prescribed by him since 2002, from the very first time he saw me.

Would you believe someone who has lied to you 99 times on the same issue? And if you did—and ended up making a false conclusion in an official court report based on the 100th lie—you would risk becoming a laughingstock once the truth was exposed. This is especially true in the case of Dr. David Cassar, who maliciously discredited me and portrayed me as a lifelong mentally disabled individual.

Regarding the third paragraph, do you consider my research and the subdomain of this website, which I dedicated to the history of my hometown Mosta, to be part of what the most sadistic, fraudulent, and deceitful psychiatrist, David Cassar, distorted into my so-called "magical bizarre" way of thinking? What is truly “magical bizarre” in this perpetually corrupt country of Malta is that, despite exposing these lies, contradictions, and injustices with clear proof and multiple pieces of evidence, no one seems to care. People readily swallow lies without question, yet struggle to accept truth and evidence even when it is placed directly before their eyes and explained in detail.

Now, let's move on to the next page of the same court report.

... and the next and final page of the report.

English translation:

From these 9 criteria, for one to arrive for diagnoses of Schizotypal Disorder, one has to satisfy 4 out of 9. Nicholas Grech satisfies 8 out of these 9 criteria.

There is evidence that this condition is related to the condition of Schizophrenia as one of Schihzophrenic Spectrum Disorders.

Conclusion

From all the clinical facts that we have evaluated, we are in a position to conclude that Nicholas Grech is suffering from a condition of ‘Schizotypal Disorder’ that is related to the condition of schizophrenia and fall under ‘Schizophrenic Spectrum Disorders.’

We also add that in the time of the alleged crimes of which he is accused, the defendant was in a state of mental alteration whereby he lacked judgement and autocriticism. Also he wasn't able to evaluate the consequences of his actions. As such he didn’t have ‘mens rea’ in the times of the commissions of the crimes.

David Cassar, Ethel Felice and Peter Muscat, the Expert Psychiatrists.

Analysis

According to their own test, meeting just 4 out of the 9 criteria would be enough to label someone as schizophrenic. Yet they outrageously claimed I satisfied 8 — painting a picture of me as so mentally broken, so deeply and permanently ill, that I must have been like that since birth. According to them, I should have been unable to attend school, let alone learn to read or write. But the truth is the exact opposite: I completed tertiary education successfully, held a stable job for years without ever needing sick leave, submitted myself to no treatment whatsoever, and never had any issues at work, at home, or anywhere else. Their report isn’t just inaccurate — it’s a deliberate distortion. And the most telling part? They conveniently refused to specify which 8 criteria they claimed I met. Why? Because they knew they were lying. It would be almost laughable — if it weren’t so damaging — to hear these so-called experts try to point out the one miraculous criterion I somehow didn’t meet. Their silence on that one missing piece says everything. It doesn’t prove their diagnosis — it exposes them for exactly what they are: frauds hiding behind a false authority.

Regarding the conclusion: these blatant lies expose a fundamental truth — psychiatry and psychology rely on assumptions, not facts. It’s no surprise they so often reach false conclusions. Supposed experts, armed with years of experience, have instead turned psychiatry into a tool of deliberate deception: painting a distorted, false picture of reality and passing lies off as facts.

Ask yourself this: would you tell the truth to someone who brazenly lies about you? Of course not. You’d mirror their tactics. Since my first encounter in 2002, they have consistently lied about me, dismissing genuine threats — like those from Magistrate Carol Peralta — as mere delusions. I kept the pills prescribed to me from the start, waiting for the right moment to expose their lies.

When that time came, I gave them exactly what they wanted: bait to lead them to false conclusions in their court report, deliberately.

The video above, taken from this TVMNews link, shows exactly the kind of fraudster and big liar you’d expect from a psychiatrist — John Mifsud. He blatantly lies on our national Maltese TV station, painting himself and his long-fake profession of psychiatry as flawless, as if no one could ever fool a psychiatrist.

But he only proves the opposite — that psychiatrists and psychiatry have been massive liars and completely fake since day one! And if he, and psychiatrists in general, can lie so shamelessly and publicly on air, just imagine how much worse they behave behind closed doors with their victims — the poor patients they silence by branding them “mentally ill” with nothing more than a stroke of a pen!

---

The last page of another report, this one by criminologist/psychologist Roberta Holland

English translation:

… personality disorder with features of Schizoid and Avoidant types, which at a severe level manifests clinically significant tendencies similar to Schizotypal Disorder.

Regarding his cases, it appears he was fixated on certain “projects” and behaved in ways that suggest he did not consider extreme traits, and his behavior was unconventional. As for criminal behavior, there is no indication that he had a propensity to commit crimes or to engage in criminal activity as a consistent pattern. However, it seems he might resort to such behavior during periods when his judgment is impaired and he does not perceive his actions as wrong. The decisions and behaviors one exhibits in life depend on personality tendencies, characteristics, dispositions, and cognitive abilities. In the accused’s case, these traits seemed to function at a pathological level and included impairments in cognitive abilities. These factors influenced his reasoning process, which in turn guided his intentions and actions.

It is worth noting that during the period when he was compliant with psychiatric medication and taking the prescribed treatment, although the aforementioned traits and symptoms were still present, they did not appear to reach a level that caused significant harm or exceeded legal thresholds, allowing him to function better. Before starting medication and after discontinuing it, his behavior seemed to deviate from normal to the extent that he harmed himself and others and broke the law.

Analysis

It is worth noting the bombastic language used in the report, with phrases like “tendencies clinically significant similar to,” “conjunctive ability,” and “pathological level.” These terms often come across as unnecessarily complex—used by those who are presumptuous and eager to impress others with what they believe is their extraordinary intelligence, more for show than for clarity. Ironically, they seem unable to express themselves in plain, simple language that the average person can understand—not even the Magistrate, who likely has no background in such subjects. And the real paradox is this: the study of the mind is still so far behind other branches of medicine that even psychologists and psychiatrists themselves often fail to truly understand what they are describing.

According to this psychologist, I was allegedly suffering from “Schizoid and Avoidant Personality Disorder” and exhibited “extreme” and “unconventional” behavior. However, these claims were entirely inconsistent with my actual life at the time. I held a steady job, had a family, maintained friendships, and lived a healthy lifestyle—including exercising regularly, averaging two hours of physical activity per day, seven days a week.

These contradictions raise serious questions about the objectivity and accuracy of her assessment. By her own interpretative logic, one could just as easily label her as schizoid, given that she appears to project imagined symptoms onto others—such as diagnosing me with a mental disorder despite clear evidence to the contrary. Worse still, if she genuinely experiences such distortions herself, it may be that her own condition leads her to see others as ill in the same way — revealing not only personal bias, but a reliance on unfounded diagnoses and nonsensical assumptions rather than clinical facts.

She may pride herself on being a "Registered warranted forensic and academic Psychologist," a "Registered chartered Psychologist (Forensic) and Chartered Scientist," and proudly writes all those letters after her name (BA, MSc, etc.), presumably believing she also possesses a sixth sense — the ability to read minds — much like a fortune teller who claims to predict your future while unable to predict his own. But in the end, she must face the fact that she couldn’t even detect whether the person sitting in front of her — whom she was busy discrediting as some mentally disabled case — was actually taking her for a ride, lying to her, deceiving and misleading her, all while she remained completely unaware. In fact, it was this very deception that led her to write the completely erroneous final paragraph in the court report (and that’s without even getting into the rest of it). That paragraph included glaring factual inaccuracies—most notably, attributing my behavior to the cessation of a treatment I supposedly received during the three years before my arrest (as I led her to believe). The truth is, I never actually took the treatment she referred to—not even during the previous nine years, from the very beginning. And even if I had, it was so insignificant that it couldn’t possibly have had any meaningful effect. These kinds of fundamental errors reveal not only a troubling lack of fact-checking, but a deeper issue: in psychiatry, facts are too often ignored in favor of presumptions, personal bias, and outright fabrications.

At the end of the day, she is like that Stulta Stultorum—a fool of the fools—the village idiot with the intelligence of a parrot, not only swallowing and repeating lies without suspicion, but proudly writing them down in her conclusion as evidence of her lack of expertise, her phoniness, and the fraudulent nature of psychiatry itself. Just like the fortune teller who pretends to read your future while completely blind to his own, she too lives in delusion, cloaked in titles but void of insight.

Consider, for example, the ancient Greek philosopher Pythagoras. Imagine if, instead of formulating the famous theorem (a² + b² = c²), he had written an elaborate report only to conclude something absurd (a + a = a²). He would not be remembered as a mathematical genius, but rather as a fool, a cautionary tale illustrating what another Greek philosopher once admitted humbly about himself: “I know that I know nothing.” Or more plainly, “The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing.”

But in the case of someone presumptuous, the opposite applies: they know nothing yet present themselves as a know-it-all. It’s one of the strange ironies of the world we live in—that a person born poor and uneducated might end up a master craftsman, celebrated for their brilliance, while another, wealthy enough to study at prestigious universities abroad, ends up more foolish than when they started — armed with a diploma, but none the wiser.

This brings to mind Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution, where only the strongest and most adaptable survived over millennia. Yet in the span of a mere century, modern science and medicine have enabled the weak and ignorant not only to survive but to thrive — and worse, to dominate. Their half-baked ideas and baseless assumptions are imposed on others, becoming the new norm. They take medication for the slightest discomfort and expect the rest of the world to do the same. In their ignorance, they cannot even recognize how little they understand.

To grasp the absurdity and injustice of it all, imagine being falsely diagnosed with AIDS — without any blood or urine tests — suddenly labeled a drug addict, a frequenter of prostitutes, or some kind of sexual deviant. That would be devastating enough. But to be falsely branded as mentally ill is even worse. You lose all dignity. You become a voice crying in the wilderness, ignored and dismissed. Your protests mean nothing, your words taken with a pinch of salt. And no matter how hard you try, you can’t scrub off the mud they’ve so maliciously smeared over you.

Roberta Holland, the criminal psychologist, was supposedly helping the police build a profile of me — the so-called 'Mosta Cat Killer.' At the time, there were still six months to go before I’d finally be caught and arraigned in March 2014, yet people were already convinced that some dangerous psychopath was behind those ‘awful crimes’ and ‘gruesome killings.’ In truth, I was quite the opposite — full of humor, and for over two years I had been staging what were simply harmless pranks, always on specific dates (mostly the 16th) and in carefully chosen locations in my hometown. Honestly, I couldn’t have made it easier for them to catch me — yet they never did. That’s not cleverness on my part; that’s just plain incompetence on theirs. I sometimes even left cryptic notes meant to mislead investigators, especially the type like Roberta. To this day, I still can’t tell who misled the police more — me, or Roberta, with her stupidity, her nonsense theories, and her complete lack of insight.

The above is a screenshot of Roberta's Holland profile, extracted from the University of Malta website. It presents her role as a visiting lecturer, showcasing her supposed academic and intellectual capabilities. What troubles me is how individuals like Holland — often presented as experts — can project authority while reaching conclusions that, in my case, were fundamentally flawed and deeply damaging.

In Maltese, we sometimes use the term "basset" to describe someone whose ideas may sound assertive or confident, but are ultimately empty — making a lot of noise without substance. It’s a fitting metaphor for what happens when qualifications like “Graduated with Honours in Psychology” are used to validate what I believe are careless assumptions and intellectually shallow reasoning.

More ironically, her profile also highlights a background in Theology — a field rooted in reflection, moral responsibility, and compassion. And yet, in my case, she demonstrated none of these values. If she truly internalized what she studied, she might have approached her assessment with greater humility, caution, and self-awareness.

To borrow from the very teachings she claims to know: “Why do you see the speck in your brother’s eye, but fail to see the plank in your own?” (Matthew 7:3). The fact that someone who prides herself on studying Theology could act with such blindness to her own intellectual and ethical shortcomings is, to me, evidence that she has understood neither Psychology nor Theology in any meaningful way.

The damage caused by her report was not theoretical — it affected my life in very real, serious ways. And that is what makes this kind of professional overconfidence not just frustrating, but dangerous.

---

After all this, don't expect Magistrate Carol Peralta to be any different ...

Extract from the court sentence, page 3

English translation
- Having seen the transcript of the court sitting of the twentieth (20th) of March 2014, during which this Court, presided over by a different magistrate (Magistrate Dr. Marsanne Farrugia), began hearing the case ("presentata" likely refers to "as presented"), and appointed Psychiatrist Dr. George Debono to examine the accused. Dr. Debono testified on the thirtieth (30th) of March 2014 and submitted his written report.
- Having seen the transcript of the court sitting of the twenty-ninth (29th) of May 2014, during which the Court appointed Dr. David Cassar, Dr. Peter Muscat, Dr. Ethel Felice, and later, Dr. Roberta Holland. The first three submitted their report on the twenty-third (23rd) of June 2014. Dr. Roberta Holland also submitted her report during the court sitting held on the same day.
- After Dr. David Cassar, Dr. Peter Muscat, Dr. Ethel Felice, and Dr. Roberta Holland confirmed under oath the conclusions reached in their respective reports.
- The Court found that the testimony and report of Dr. George Debono were inconclusive.

Extract from the court sentence, page 5

English translation
- This Court is not obliged to rely on the experts' opinions if it disagrees with their conclusions.
- However, in this case, the Court finds that it cannot disagree, because the experts' judgment was based on a psychiatric evaluation, and the outcome of that evaluation is rooted in scientific findings. Therefore, the Court believes it cannot disregard their conclusions regarding the chronic illness from which the accused suffers.
- As a result, the Court is faced with a situation in which it is convinced that the unlawful act was indeed committed by the accused, but that it occurred while he was suffering from a psychotic episode — a severe mental illness that deprived him of the ability to distinguish between right and wrong.

Analysis

Note how Peralta quotes the date"thirty (30) March 2014" using BOTH words and figures, as if to emphasize the accuracy of this date. This is when the supposed psychiatrist, George Debono, testified and submitted his court report. However, that date happened to fall on a Sunday. He should have written 30 April 2014 — a month later. It was not some genuine mistake by Peralta. Given the revenge he sought against me, he deliberately manipulated the date to make it seem as though the report was filed BEFORE he officially took over my case on 1 April 2014 — April Fool’s Day — coinciding with my second court appearance in my second case that year.

It was as if he wanted to start everything afresh. My first court case had clearly left a strong impression on him; it wasn’t just another file he forgot after it was closed. On the contrary, he remembered me vividly — as well as the psychiatrists he had previously appointed. These same psychiatrists had essentially saved his career during a crucial moment, and now he was rewarding them again with another assignment. He knew exactly the kind of "expertise" to expect from them.

By pretending to seek independent evaluations, he simply re-used the same people who had already declared me mentally ill. He knew there was virtually no chance they would now contradict their earlier judgment — especially if the process was biased from the start. The only hiccup in his plan was that one of the three psychiatrists from the first case, Joseph Pisani, had since passed away. So, on 29 May 2014, he replaced him with Ethel Felice, a woman intended to "balance" the panel. But the reality was that the two dominant male psychiatrists — both from my first court case — would ultimately dictate everything.

It would have been futile for me to attempt explaining the complexities of my first case in front of them — even with Ethel Felice present. She was unlikely to override, or even question, their original account. Ultimately, my only way out was to accept being labeled mentally ill once again — but on my own terms: by deliberately leading them to that conclusion through a web of fabrications they would foolishly believe and rely on. In doing so, I would expose the flaws in their reasoning and demonstrate that these psychiatrists — and, by extension, the field as a whole — are not merely unreliable but complete frauds: people utterly incapable of deciphering a mind, let alone detecting a lie crafted specifically to mislead them.

The sentence “The Court felt that the testimony and the report of Dr. George Debono was inconclusive” is particularly revealing. Peralta's use of “The Court” and the previously mentioned intentionally incorrect date may be a deliberate attempt to suggest that this occurred during Dr. Marsanne Farrugia’s tenure — before Peralta himself took over. It is as if he is implying that she was the one who found Debono’s testimony inconclusive and that the process had to start from scratch, redoing everything afresh.

In doing so, Peralta decisively discredits Debono’s professional standing, portraying him as incompetent, lacking expertise, unfit for purpose — essentially, a waste of time when it comes to delivering psychiatric opinions. The Maltese word “iċċumbah” — meaning “he hit the nail on the head” — captures this bluntly: not only was Debono wrong, but psychiatry itself is portrayed as flawed, even fundamentally illegitimate and fraudulent. For rest assured: had there existed some X-ray test or whatever equivalent, Debono would have used it to avoid the embarrassment of being portrayed as a pure Gahan — a colloquial Maltese term for a fool.

Peralta unintentionally exposes psychiatry as a discipline in which the psychiatrist is, in essence, a failed doctor — a fraud on a scale far greater than any fortune-teller. This reflects a broader, deeply rooted skepticism toward psychiatry — one that Peralta clearly recognized and shared — grounded in the belief that psychiatric assessments lack objective scientific evidence, such as blood tests or brain scans, and are therefore inherently unreliable.

But later, Peralta outright contradicts himself by calling the report written by the three others and Roberta Holland "a scientific one." Scientific? It was so full of so-called “science” that they all walked straight into my trap and drew the exact conclusion I wanted — the wrong one. These people pretend they can read minds, yet they’re so pathetically incompetent they can’t even tell when someone is blatantly lying to their faces.

I told Debono the same thing I told them — just weeks apart. So if Debono alone is, in Peralta’s eyes, a fool for producing an "inconclusive" report, then what does that make the others? Even bigger fools. All of them — the three plus Holland — managed to humiliate themselves by calling their nonsense a "scientific" and conclusive report, when in reality, it was built entirely on lies they were too arrogant and clueless to recognize.

If Debono’s report proves anything, it’s not about me — it proves he’s a fraud. And if the others came to the same bogus conclusion, then they’re even worse. (I don’t have Debono’s report in hand, but I’m pretty sure I fed him the same lie — only he was too unsure to commit, so he landed on "inconclusive.")

There is no science in psychiatry. None. Psychiatrists can’t even agree on the same person, the same case. One sees it round, another square. One claims certainty, another hesitates. One delivers a wrong conclusion with confidence, another delivers an inconclusive — and still wrong — mess. They're not experts. They're charlatans, pretending to decode minds when they can’t even spot a lie served to them on a silver platter.

Now let us analyze in more detail some key dates, all from the year 2014:

• From 20 March (when psychiatrist Debono was nominated) to 30 April (when he testified and submitted his report), there are 41 days.
• From 7 May (when three psychiatrists were nominated, but Pisani had already died) to 29 May (when Holland and Felice, instead of Pisani, were nominated), there are 22 days.
• From that same 29 May (when the three psychiatrists, including Felice, were officially nominated) to 23 June (when they testified and submitted their reports, along with the one by Holland), there are 24 days.
• But incredibly, from the court sitting on Monday, 23 June (when these two reports were submitted), to Thursday, 26 June (when the sentence was delivered), only three days passed. How could Peralta possibly find a gap in his busy court schedule to set a court sitting within just three days — during the same week, not even across a weekend? Did he somehow have ample spare time to write a 10-page sentence (admittedly, most of it was copy-pasted)?

Was Peralta trying to convey some message to me by intentionally delivering the sentence on 26 June?

Of course, this was all premeditated. When I searched "26 June" out of curiosity, the first result was a Wikipedia article noting that it's the 177th day of the year. That number, 177, also happens to be the identity card number of the daughter of that former registrar — whom I had mocked for so long during my first court case, and whose number I often wrote on walls with reference to her, among other things.

This date, therefore, was no coincidence. I’m certain Peralta deliberately chose it to send a message: that this was a continuation of my first court case. A form of revenge he had long been planning. Everything felt so carefully orchestrated. So much I was denied a fair trial and suffered yet another miscarriage of justice.

The date of the sentencing — 26 June 2014 — was therefore not random at all. Not a day earlier or later. It was specifically chosen to trigger painful memories and remind me of the injustice I had previously endured. The second court case felt like a direct continuation of the first, bringing more humiliation and unfairness. Hopefully, one day, such calculated cruelty — this act of metaphorically rubbing salt into the wound — will serve to further incriminate those involved.

Peralta’s full sentencing document can be found at this link.

Also, as shown in this Wikipedia link, "The United Nations International Day in Support of Victims of Torture is an international observance held annually on 26 June to speak out against the crime of torture and to honour and support victims and survivors throughout the world" Magistrate Carol Peralta undoubtedly knew this. In fact, the article even mentions: "On 16 July 2009, the International Day in Support of Victims of Torture was chosen as a public holiday in Bosnia and Herzegovina" — where he himself had been stationed.

After spending nearly six years in exile in Bosnia and Kosovo — torn away from his home, his friends, his colleagues, and his beloved Malta — because I had reported him, he must have come to see himself as a victim. Perhaps even one of those very victims of "torture" that the UN day was meant to honour. When the UN mission in Kosovo ended in September 2012, it gave him the perfect opportunity to return (in March of that year) and slide back into his old role — as if nothing had happened.

To those who think his time in the Balkans was some kind of career promotion, let’s be honest: it was more like a teacher being forced to leave his post, spending years abroad pretending to be a university professor, only to come back in shame to the same school he was ousted from. And it was even more humiliating than that — because when he came back, he publicly admitted that he didn’t even know if he’d be allowed to return to the Bench.

But somehow, he did return. And then, on 26 June 2014 — of all days — he sentenced me. That date wasn’t just randomly chosen. It was deliberate. Calculated. The symbolism must have thrilled him. The United Nations Day in Support of Victims of Torture... and there he was, using it to turn the tables, to punish the one who had exposed him. It was revenge, plain and simple.

And he knew exactly what kind of “torture” lay ahead for me. He knew that psychiatrist David Cassar had already prepared a fate far worse than anything he had experienced himself: a slow, silent, medical execution through the cruel side effects of psychiatric drugs. What he endured abroad was exile. What I was about to endure was destruction.

But if you think I am just inflating things on purpose, consider again the date of 1-Apr / April Fool's Day (Magistrate Carol Peralta takes over my case from Magistrate Marsanne Farrugia) till 26-Jun (Magistrate Peralta sentences me to Mount Carmel Hospital) there are just 86 days. Such a short span of time that had all Magistrates / Judges been so efficient as Peralta, the backlog in our (corrupt Malta) Courts would for sure be reduced significantly, let alone almost everyone having a case in Court no matter how complex, will be happy or not it will be decided within say a matter of some 3 months. Such a short span of time Peralta so fast came to deliver me the sentence to give Psychiatrist David Cassar the go ahead so that with all liberty use his venom of psychiatric medication, indirectly satisfying Peralta's so great appetite for revenge on me, by disabling / sedating me, by eliminating me slowly through such poison. So much the premeditated killing of me by these 2 masterminds through their abuse of power was so perfectly planned in the most legal unsuspicious way, with both taking advantage of that moment when so great was the character assassination and the instigation of hatred on me by the media and the Police with their unfounded accusations.

Also after myself having most often than not hanged the crucified animals on that specific day of the month, namely the 16th, it is as if he wanted to reciprocate by using a date which was so significant for him, probably had imagined me as somewhat obsessed with dates to end one day decipher his message, the meaning behind that particular date of 26th June he so specifically chose to have me sentenced, actually to intentionally make me realise how far his narcissism goes, that so great premeditated revenge on me! (as if he wanted to mean: wahdu jiehodha r-risposta / by himself he will get the message).

Also between 12-Jun-02 (1st time Peralta locked me, kidnapped me to Mount Carmel Hospital in my 1st court case, then a year later had to go work abroad exile himself because of me having reported him), and 26-Jun-14 (1st time Peralta haf the opportunity to sentence me to Mount Carmel Hospital, in my 2nd court case) there are 4398 days (=666*6 + 66*6 + 6, in Christianity, 666 is called the "number of the beast", Book of Revelation 13:18, who knows, maybe Peralta through his sadism strives to be one). Without going into further detail, just say that seeing Peralta's involvement with Freemasons (note he did not enter some chivalric order of noble nature like the Sovereign Military Order of Malta but something which goes against establishment, which says much about his character), there could be that umpteenth reason for him choosing 26-Jun, so much that even his (forced) resignation letter is dated 26-Aug-15 (same day '26' of month, exactly 14 months after having sentenced me / locked me [had his revenge on me], equivalent to 60 weeks + 6 days later, or 426 days [=66x6 + 6x6 - 6 = 666 - 6x6x6 - 6x6 + 6+6]), but would rather say that in the same way Judas Iscariot was chosen to betray Christ, Peralta was similarly chosen to show through his sadism the widespread corruption and injustices you can expect from a Maltese court (these emails give you a clue), and myself through the evil of Psychiatry am experiencing a tiny bit myself the humiliation, the lies, the sufferings, etc., Christ himself must have passed from and is still being ridiculed and lied upon on a large scale, also forming part of my misfortune, having inherited it from my father, himself from his father, etc., for many many other dates happened to fit at intervals say from birthdays, day of death of ancestors, Identity card numbers, feasts, and so on and so forth, as if everything in my family was programmed beforehand. If I ever manage to overcome the poison and sadism of Psychiatry and get out from Mount Carmel Hospital alive and with mental capacity, I intend to write a book within which dedicate a chapter to the numerolgy of dates concerning my family members, including my pets, and court cases - comes to mind the quote by an ancient Roman writer, Marcus Manilius: "Nascentes morimur, finisque ab origine pendet.“ ... As we are born we die, and the end commences with the beginning (i.e. our destiny has been written on birth).

---

Quoting narcissist Magistrate Carol Peralta's premeditated lies: "the result of their examination was a scientific one", this may be of help:

"The latest scientific survey I made shows that when one applies the Multiple Imputation Technique ... The survey was carried out (on 6 days), has a sample of 750 persons ... has a margin of error +/-3.6%." We are living in an unfortunate era where one to give further credibility to his research / study claims it to be "scientific," this one calls it so for simply calling 750 persons asking them questions whom they are to vote. Now compare this to one who runs a shop, say a supermarket, who from experience knows he sells "750" cabbages (56.2% type PL, 42.1% type PN) ever "6" days, so every year (365 days) he stocks (750/6)*365*(100+/-3.6)/100 cabbages - by the same reasoning should we follow the trend and call this scientific and the supermarket advertise itself as running its stocks scientifically?

"The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, often known as the DSM is a reference book on mental health and brain-related conditions and disorders (note in the extract above from Psychologist Roberta Holland's report, she makes 3 times reference to this "DSM", you find them as end notes at the bottom!). The American Psychiatric Association (APA) is responsible for the writing, editing, reviewing and publishing of this book."

But despite living in an era of continuous scientific breaktroughs, in Psychiatry there is still not even the slightest scientific test on which Psychiatrists can base their diagnoses, so they literally end grasping to straws add the "statistical" part in trying in vain to give themselves some credibility, only that in statistics there is even more no science, so at the end of the day Psychiatrists are confirming themselves as the since ever completely fake NO SCIENCE profession, with psychiatric diagnosis must still rely exclusively on FALLIBLE subjective judgments ... and to hell their victims.

---

Conclusion: Psychiatry, NO science, NO cures

The above video by CCHR International was downloaded from this link. No wonder Psychiatry being that fake found fertile ground in the Maltese Court, just as well as blatant frame-ups by Police. For from the typical Court you can expect in a corrupt country since ever, don't expect my 2 court cases to be isolated ones: The Court sentences Emanuel Camilleri to prison on the false testimony of his daughter, ignoring evidence (the virginity of his daughter). The Court putting aside evidence (a letter which indicated otherwise) which could possibly indicate false testimony resulting in another man innocently jailed. There was also the case of Nicholas Azzopardi. This is how he was vilified, this how he possibly was. Note how intentionally they appointed the same magistrate which not in a billionth chance would he retract a single word from his previous report as that would make him appear as incompetent, and amongst others how the CCTV footage of when this Azzopardi was figured to have jumped committed suicide is mysteriously (or maybe for obvious reasons) missing. Possibly another case where evidence was intentionally eliminated to end distort completely the whole story on one who from his tomb can't make his point. These father and son each jailed 20 years (despite the fact that it was the son who did the stabbing, the father simply happened to be with him) for Ħamrun murder, with the same judge (Dr. Consuelo-Pilar Scerri Herrera) just months before had sentenced this one, framed-up as an attempted murder (despite the supposed victim not only wasn't hit, not only suffered no disabilty, let alone a mere scar) to 32 years in jail, yet this one for an attempted double murder which left both victims injured was jailed for 25 years. There was also the case of that Dutch who was sentenced to 30 years in prison, while that Serbian for an almost identical but a bit less severe crime was given a life sentence in prison - the difference came from the fact that the latter involved a very "wealthy" businessman. This one got it even better as for the stabbing which resulted in a fatality, he was allowed to run away scot-free by the previously mentioned judge Dr. Consuelo-Pilar Scerri Herrera. This one the most he could have received was a suspended sentence. However, with the backing of the Union, they deliberately delayed his arraignment to allow tensions to subside. Once things had calmed down, corrupt psychiatrists played their part by continuously provoking the patient. They kept him in seclusion for six months, then denied him access to the hospital’s main garden for several more months, let alone granting him leave from the hospital. They also for long deprived him of his smartphone, all of which provocations served as an excuse to further drug and overdose him, ultimately preventing him from ever testifying against. This is a case where the Court intentionally makes life difficult. And the list goes on, for injustices in a Maltese court are almost the order of the day - the friends (in some way they excuse you), enemies (in some way they blame you) and money (like the words some local prominent lawyers tell you "Ghax jien ma niekolx kollox wahdi" / "Because I do not eat alone") you have can make a big difference.