There is a troubling pattern in which men and women holding public office react with disproportionate severity to minor expressions made by private citizens. In this case, it is against this elderly man, Navarro, who in a simple Facebook comment wrote that “traitors,” including Roberta Metsola, “deserved” (not “should”) to be burnt alive. Yet, of course, she sees nothing wrong the other way around — namely, serious abuses committed by people in power against ordinary citizens, as happened to me. This shows clear double standards.

Imagine Navarro ending up framed and character-assassinated by the police, who claimed they found his car’s fuel tank “full of petrol” ready to commit a crime. Some influential professor from the University of corrupt Malta issues a 24/7 blog post — practically a death fatwa — calling for Navarro to be crucified. When Navarro tries to defend himself in court, the Magistrate cuts him short and threatens to smash him against the wall. Realizing his own career is at risk, the Magistrate appoints a psychiatrist to falsely label Navarro as suffering from “delusions of persecution,” making it harder for him to expose the abuses and easier for others to dismiss him.

Navarro ends up drugged, kidnapped, vilified by the media with baseless hatred, defrauded by his own lawyers (1, 2, 3, 4a and 4b, 5a, 5b, 5c, 5d, 5img, 5rec_a, 5rec_b, 5rec_c and 5rec_d, including those supposedly provided through taxpayer-funded Legal Aid), and abandoned entirely on his own to be further abused (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12). His laptop is broken, his phone screen cracked, and every time he seeks help he finds only closed doors. Amid all these injustices, abuses, and violations of human rights, Roberta Metsola remains silent — making herself complicit through her inaction, just as she had done with me when I informed her of my ordeal.

If influential figures such as Roberta Metsola derive such evident satisfaction from pursuing punitive action against an ordinary citizen — as in the case of Navarro, who was arraigned in court and handed a suspended sentence, with the Magistrate reportedly even ordering the destruction of his mobile phone, potentially erasing irreplaceable personal photographs and memories — one can only imagine how those same individuals might have responded in my case. I have made serious allegations on this website concerning several powerful figures, including Metsola herself. Had I written even the slightest untrue or defamatory statement, it is difficult to doubt that they would have seized upon the opportunity to initiate proceedings against me. Indeed, it is equally conceivable that they would have acted swiftly to shut down my website altogether.

Consider further that Metsola subsequently became President of the European Parliament. In response, I submitted a petition to the European Parliament addressing the entrenched impunity enjoyed in Malta by individuals holding high office in connection with my case. I questioned Metsola’s silence and inaction in her capacity as head of one of Europe’s principal institutions. Nevertheless, my petition was declared inadmissible on the grounds of “incoherent reasoning” (as indicated in documents labeled doc1 and doc2). It is hard not to observe the contrast: a Magistrate (Peralta) who ordered the arrest of a journalist after referring to him as a “parasite” and “scum” would scarcely be expected to welcome criticism — particularly from someone he had, wrongfully characterized as “mentally unfit” in a manner that was calculated to safeguard his own professional standing — had I written anything abusive or inaccurate about him on this website.

This raises a further question of proportionality and consistency. Was a single screenshot, approximately 110 kB in size, sufficient grounds to prosecute an ordinary citizen such as Navarro, while an entire website — amounting to roughly 0.7 GB of documents and supporting material — remains insufficient to prompt proceedings against powerful officeholders?

The perception of impunity in Malta becomes even more striking when one considers the contrast in terms of scale. In a functioning and accountable jurisdiction, an individual who endured comparable abuses might conceivably be awarded compensation amounting to billions of euros. Yet in Malta, the reality is inverted: even if I were to expend billions of euros pursuing justice, there is little indication that this would prompt the prosecution of those involved. And were such proceedings ever to materialize, there remains a serious concern that they would amount to little more than a procedural formality rather than a genuine and substantive effort to ensure accountability.

“One of my priorities … is to reach out to as many citizens as possible … to listen, to discuss, to speak about aspirations, achievements, and ambitions.” But apparently not to care, not to listen, and not to discuss injustices, abuse of power, and violations of human rights affecting ordinary people. Leaving those out was hardly a coincidence. In other posts she declares, “We believe in equality before the law.” I leave it to you to judge whether Roberta Metsola is just another fake politician at EU level, emerging from corrupt Malta. If you want to see what this corrupt Roberta Metsola — with such blatant double standards — is really made of, visit the link: The Metsola Exception.

Writing to members of the government in corrupt Malta similarly results in silence — too arrogant even to reply, let alone take action. Writing to the non-existent, equally corrupt opposition produces the same outcome. And as for the media, expectations are low: by publishing fabricated stories now and then — alongside the dictated ones — they keep themselves comfortably in business.

Then there are those who brand themselves “independent,” though only in name. Prof. Arnold Cassola portrays himself as a champion of righteousness. Yes, he replies — often within minutes — which at least shows basic courtesy. But when the issue involves abuses and injustices that would implicate powerful figures — his friends or friends of friends — the courage suddenly disappears. No matter how overwhelming the evidence, he avoids the subject entirely, as shown in the image above (look closely at the left side of the post he shared around 14 July 2022; if that is not enough, consider another example from her so-called “bestiality art” series, which she promotes while casting herself as a victim). When presenting oneself as a victim, portraying the alleged abuser as an animal is absurd — an animal cannot rape a human being. If symbolism is the aim, choose something grounded in reality.

This email thread provides strong indications that the post was yet another fabricated local media story (LovinMalta, TVM News, Times Of Malta). Yet this University of Malta professor accepted it uncritically and amplified it. On the right side of above image, you can see my message to him two days later, on 16 July, asking how he could share a dubious abuse claim while remaining silent about well-documented abuses supported by substantial evidence. That silence speaks volumes. So much for his supposed principles.

Similarly at one point, I was in contact with a certain Sandra Gauci, who occasionally uploads videos in which she discusses controversial topics. I wrote to her around July 2021 about the victims of Psychiatry, and as can be seen in this email thread, on August 12, 2021, at 3:14 p.m., she replied with the following, translated into English:
"I found someone who is also a victim of the same doctor of yours (namely Psychiatrist David Cassar). I am trying to convince him to testify. His brother died from the medicines he prescribed. I will keep you updated, as the one involved wants justice and will work in your favour. For now I am not going to disclose anything, but you are not the only victim. At least you are (still) alive."

But this hope of some help was short-lived, as I never heard anything more from her. For as the Latin proverb says: CURAE LEVES LOQUUNTUR, INGENTES STUPENT — Slight griefs talk, great ones are speechless.

Bad luck for the many victims of Psychiatry left all alone, abandoned to their fate. Another death from it doesn’t matter; what matters is if one dares to speak against it.

The above represents yet another case of impunity, Malta style, involving a certain Alan Fiott. Despite reporting his harassment to the Police and the relevant authorities, no effective action was taken, suggesting that such complaints were ultimately in vain. Mr. Fiott went so far as to address me as “a mignun lol” (“you are insane,” followed by laughter) using his official @gov.mt email account in his capacity as an Executive at JobsPlus. This occurred while he was fully aware that I am currently confined in a mental health institution.

Intom specjalment inti ja Traditura ta pajisek muwx kundana haqkom imma naharkuwkom hajjin demmel